chefpyrosjunk-deactivated201707: It says robosexual on your business card

deeceeoh:

zedrin-maybe:

but ditto

I AM a robot. :Y

That just means you like diddling with fleshies then.

yeah sedrin, robots cant sexual, so even robosexual robots need humans - .-

Anonymous: Real talk: What started the "robots are not for sexual" meme? Because robots aren't real (at least the kinds anyone would want to have sex with aren't) and clearly we're all folks who ogle at the occasional mechanical lady. So what's the deal?

zedrin-maybe:

gearholder started it, based off of a skit from Futurama. In one episode Bender and Amy go out and people start preaching against robosexuals, talking about how it could lead to some societal collapse. :Y

WRONG! It was Fry dating Lucy Liubot ù.ú

suplup: If robots are not for sexual, is there sexual that is for robots?

zedrin-maybe:

There is. Robot porn. FOR ROBOTS.

footpawfetish: not rlly Fluff-kevlar has a hot furry ask blog that's also a robot

gearholder:

If anyone got a link tag it and maybe all these sickos following me can chek it out or whatever -. -

Ok go check it out ya sickos -.-

gearholder: srsly, on your wall must be a plate that says "Days without violatings" where you hang numbers but it's always at zero -.- poor scrammu babbu u.u

youobviouslyloveoctavia:

>:/

Shouldn’t you be supporting Scram on this?

Robots aren’t for sexual?

I said poor scrammu! >:Y

And there’s nothing I can do, othergear is your mechanic and as such you’re in her jurisdicktion >:T

groovykirby: Are cyborgs for sexual?

kirbybrony:

gearholder:

Look man if you want to go and diminish a human’s worth for their lack of appendages that’s entirely up to you.

You take that with you to sleep tonight, cuz I know I ain’t gonna change hearts and minds in a day. You don’t give a man a peanut and expect him to have a farm the next day.

But it’s alright. It’s alright. One day we will all be equal on this earth. Now come here muffin, I’m gonna give you a kis-PSYCHE!

Woah, woah!!!
I was just asking a question!
It’s not like I’m going to sneak into a house of a person who is half machine, reprogram their mechanical parts, and force them to have sex! That’s rape!!
I didn’t mean it to be interpreted that way. I’m sorry if it came across like that.

No but what you did do was put into question a human’s right to sexuality just for having roboparts .-.

So get freaky for all the metal you want on humans, cybersex is completely allowed ._.

Anonymous: Someone apparently isn't familiar with pleasurebots.

A hooker robot would be in line with the second law idiot, and save humans from STDs and shit meaning that it’d also obey the first .-.

The danger in robosexuality is that the species stops putting effort into being a society, because they can get pleasure from obedient machines instead of fighting to get sentient beings into consenting a sex. A hookar requires effort because $$$ so it still is a productive relation, but dating them grants free secks.

Get the fuckin point already youu… dense motherfuckers è____é

I’ve now resroted to copypasting myself, I hope you’re happy with yourself .-.

Anonymous: Gladys the shark not GLaDOS from portal. GLaDOS was formerly human though.

nomiros:

zedrin-maybe:

nomiros:

adurot:

not-reality:

gearholder:

Shark is okay, it doesn’t endanger human existance. MAYBE the genpool, but the planet’s still safe so it’s okay yes.

As for this, you shush zed, you didn’t even know what the 3 Laws of Robotics were until I told ya, so you can’t advice these kids in safe robot interface
t(û.ú t)

You didn’t know the three laws…?

Why are we allowing someone who doesn’t know the three laws to make robots?! That’s irresponsible and dangerous!

You didn’t know the three laws ? O.o

I knew what the 3 laws were, just hadn’t ever heard them referred to as a specific title or official thing. But either way they would’ve been silly and restrictive.

To be fair, 90% of Asimov’s writing is demonstrating how useless his own three laws are in practice.

NEVER CALL THE LAWS USELSS, NUMEROS (╯°Д°）╯︵/(.□ . \)

THE LAWS ARE THERE FOR OUR BENEFIT DAMINT, IF YOU WANT YOUR NON-ASENIONS RUNING WILD AMONG HUMANS THAT’S FINE, BUT I GOT PRINCIPLES AND WORK ETHICS TO FOLLOW.