Anonymous
asked:
Are you saying wanting to screw a hard light hologram counts as robosexual though no robot is present?

Think of… a book. You have this block of paper, maybe with some cool images on the cover, but it is not the story. Then you may say that the words are the story, but they’re not, they’re smudges of ink neatly spread across the paper. The story is an informational phenomenon that can only happen when you read the book, and only if you can understand what the smudges are saying.

Then, an AI isn’t the computer nor body housing it, and it also isn’t the complex connections alternating between ons and offs to be interpreted as 1′s and 0′s. The AI is those series of 1′s and 0′s being used to perform logical operations, too advanced for me to describe, that allow it to be. The robosexual thought emerges from having profoundly associated the AI with the physical representation of what the informational being is.

In short: