NO YOU WALKING CESSPOOL OF ELECTROSIN, THE OBJECT MATTER HERE IS ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, AND THE POINT IS YOU CAN’T FUCK AN AI WITHOUT A BODY, WHICH IS WHY ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS DON’T EXTEND TO AI’S
A ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHT WOULD BE SOMETHIN LIKE “Man I’d totally let aliens conquer the Earth just to put my weenus in Pivot’s weenus port” NOTICE THE INVOLVEMENT OF A PIECE OF HARDWARE THERE
SO LONG AS AI’S REMAIN TRAPPED IN A NON-PHYSICAL SPACE THEY CAN’T BE THE OBJECT OF ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, GODDDDDDD ò Aó
Are you aware that light constitutes a physical phenomenon?
Like, even if intangible, a hologram is a physical body? Which is the thing an AI needs to entice robosexual thoughts? Yes? Do you see what’s happening here?
Is it that Cortana is an example of an AI that brings up robosexual thoughts? Or is it that halo 5 sucks*? Or am I missing the point?
*least I think it does. :\
Her hologram (light=physical) makes you think sexually about her. Remove that and then her voice (sound=also physical) may do it too.
An AI that is not physical exists only as the information that goes through a computing device.
nephrited said:
The whole point was that it would lead to the downfall of humanity iirc. The definition of robot vs AI is irrelevant, gear is just trying to save face.
zedrin-maybe said:
but you can fuck an AI without a body. That’s why VR was invented :0
also why would I want to fuck Pivot’s elbow she has a puss puss you know