Live and Love under Patooties' peculiar light
NO YOU WALKING CESSPOOL OF ELECTROSIN, THE OBJECT MATTER HERE IS ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, AND THE POINT IS YOU CAN’T FUCK AN AI WITHOUT A BODY, WHICH IS WHY ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS DON’T EXTEND TO AI’S
A ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHT WOULD BE SOMETHIN LIKE “Man I’d totally let aliens conquer the Earth just to put my weenus in Pivot’s weenus port” NOTICE THE INVOLVEMENT OF A PIECE OF HARDWARE THERE
SO LONG AS AI’S REMAIN TRAPPED IN A NON-PHYSICAL SPACE THEY CAN’T BE THE OBJECT OF ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, GODDDDDDD ò Aó
parsivall liked this
endarkculi liked this
maybeiwasserious liked this nephrited said: The whole point was that it would lead to the downfall of humanity iirc. The definition of robot vs AI is irrelevant, gear is just trying to save face.
tpest liked this
not-the-conversation-starter liked this
kalianos liked this
drewsgroove reblogged this from gearholder and added:
So are you saying is that an AI is only non robosexual if it can not have a physical appearance or physical sound? IF SO...
masteredwood liked this
pseudonymouslps reblogged this from gearholder
mikonopants said: What am I witnessing?
kaijuzilla liked this
gearholder reblogged this from drewsgroove and added:
Her hologram (light=physical) makes you think sexually about her. Remove that and then her voice (sound=also physical)...
micchy-did-nothing-wrong said: What I see happening is your argument becoming more and more complex and as a result weakening. :^)
baconwaifu liked this
takamoris liked this
raltkiz liked this
zedrin-maybe said: but you can fuck an AI without a body. That’s why VR was invented :0 also why would I want to fuck Pivot’s elbow she has a puss puss you know