Live and Love under Patooties' peculiar light
NO YOU WALKING CESSPOOL OF ELECTROSIN, THE OBJECT MATTER HERE IS ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, AND THE POINT IS YOU CAN’T FUCK AN AI WITHOUT A BODY, WHICH IS WHY ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS DON’T EXTEND TO AI’S
A ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHT WOULD BE SOMETHIN LIKE “Man I’d totally let aliens conquer the Earth just to put my weenus in Pivot’s weenus port” NOTICE THE INVOLVEMENT OF A PIECE OF HARDWARE THERE
SO LONG AS AI’S REMAIN TRAPPED IN A NON-PHYSICAL SPACE THEY CAN’T BE THE OBJECT OF ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, GODDDDDDD ò Aó
parsivall liked this
endarkculi liked this
maybeiwasserious liked this
tpest liked this
not-the-conversation-starter liked this
kalianos liked this
drewsgroove reblogged this from gearholder and added:
So are you saying is that an AI is only non robosexual if it can not have a physical appearance or physical sound? IF SO...
masteredwood liked this
pseudonymouslps reblogged this from gearholder
mikonopants said: What am I witnessing?
kaijuzilla liked this
gearholder reblogged this from drewsgroove and added:
Her hologram (light=physical) makes you think sexually about her. Remove that and then her voice (sound=also physical)...
micchy-did-nothing-wrong said: What I see happening is your argument becoming more and more complex and as a result weakening. :^)
baconwaifu liked this
mrs-zuipperpips liked this
raltkiz liked this
zedrin-maybe said: but you can fuck an AI without a body. That’s why VR was invented :0 also why would I want to fuck Pivot’s elbow she has a puss puss you know