deeceeoh: Okay, so robots are not for sexual. But is hanging out with buddybots like Bender okay?

k’ but if anyone asks you their de-bugger -.-

Anonymous: i can't help but laugh at the likely reaction for jenny having the passing thought of asking her mom to install that part.

I didn’t need that in my brain

brainy-twilight: She probably wouldn't mind though.

I understand you’re a brain and thus don’t have a reason to, but do you even know what ergonomics are and how important they are for designing a mech?

Spoilers: very ._.

brainy-twilight: Jenny Wakeman is not a good example of an emotionless robot.

You know what she’s also not good for? Sexual >:T

Anonymous: xj9 (Jenny) does have such an emotion simulator so why use her for your nefarious no love for robots campaign?

The campaing is against Asenion robos. Non-Asenions are the ones with Universal Robot Rights and also the ones contemplated by Proposition Infinity. Also cuz she’s a cutie.

ù_ú

Anonymous: happy robots and embarrassed robots are somehow more fuel efficient. so yes kiss the robot.

Know what’s even more efficient? NOT having to waste space in their mainframes wth some stupid ass emotion program that makes their processing slower and may obstacle them fullfilling their prime directive