deeceeoh: I'm totally gonna draw FemGear and Pivot kissing now.

DC you basterd, you’re just like Ross and Barry playing sims ;`A´;

hybriddreamin-deactivated201910: Little do people know, the twist is that Gear has secretly been a robot this whole time but had a very bad experience in the past and is now trying to get everyone to leave robots alone.

Anonymous: But, according to you, non-sentient bots are not for sexual.

You frugal fukers have pushed me and the rest of the comitee into yielding, so confartulations you fat nasty trashes t(ùmú t)

So now, as long as it doesn’t drive us extinct, that motto only applies to engineers. For work ethics ù_ú

budaclees: Nigga a part of a whole human is sex. It's considered a basic human need. People will want to love robots and sex is a part of love. I'm pushing for more human than human sentient machines. Plus fap bots would get gross fast

Then do it legally you dumpst fuckt .-.

budaclees: But you're excluding capitalism. Free market for competition. People will make sentient sex bots and make a fortune because you won't make em

You just can’t let go can you .-.

The simple sex toys that are non-sentientbots are far less costly, which makes for a larger gain. Sentient ones can and will cause damage to both owner and customer if they so damn please. What do you even want the sentiency for if all you want is sex? you want the bot to oppose? turn a faptoy into a rapetoy? is that it? .-.

Illegal sentiency is stupid. You’re stupid. Stop being stupid .-.

Anonymous: What if you create a legal, sentient robot for non-sexual purposes, but it desires physical intimacy with others on its own? Is there some kind of online dating service for robots that want intimate relations with each other, or with humans?

Among robots yes, it’s healthy for their circuits and stuff.

As for with humans