Anonymous: If a robot is built specifically for sexual, is it still not for sexual?
The Sex Robot Conundrum:
Humans are for sexual. Humans create robots. Robots not for sexual. Humans, in their arrogance, create robots for sexual. Robots for sexual. Sex robots. Sexual humans. Robosexuals.
Robosexuals become obsessed with sex robots. Robosexuals become obsessed with robot sex. Robosexuals become obsessed with robots. Robosexuals become disinterested in human sex. Robosexuals become disinterested in humans. Metal Fever.
From an objective point of view, the CF-07H has an actual ability programmed into it (is a culinary machine thing) while the DC-Ω6 is just another aesthetic asset acquired as an alternative to less breast-abled mannequins (it’s prime directive is “greet and service people at places where big boobs are important”). It’s a no-contest u .u
From a subjective point of view, don’t fuckin turn my friends into robots, objectifying people puts them into limited personality boxes which may be hurtful - _-
I…. I think I’d at least have cameras and on-board video editing software, if we’re talking job-based robots.
That one is the DC-ß5 model - .-
Please tell me the DC series is modular.
That depends on wht you mean by modules… like the megazord?
From an objective point of view, the CF-07H has an actual ability programmed into it (is a culinary machine thing) while the DC-Ω6 is just another aesthetic asset acquired as an alternative to less breast-abled mannequins (it’s prime directive is “greet and service people at places where big boobs are important”). It’s a no-contest u .u
From a subjective point of view, don’t fuckin turn my friends into robots, objectifying people puts them into limited personality boxes which may be hurtful - _-
I…. I think I’d at least have cameras and on-board video editing software, if we’re talking job-based robots.