IT’S COMPLEXITIZICING BECAUSE YOU’LL COWARDS WON’T FOCUS ON A SINGLE THING, SO I HAVTO KEEP BUILDING SIDEWARDS ON IT
IT IS NO WEAKENING IT IS WIDENING ò Aó

IT’S COMPLEXITIZICING BECAUSE YOU’LL COWARDS WON’T FOCUS ON A SINGLE THING, SO I HAVTO KEEP BUILDING SIDEWARDS ON IT

IT IS NO WEAKENING IT IS WIDENING ò Aó

11 notes6 years ago

theurlgoeshere: Miku is a Vocaloid. The entire point of her is sound. Since Sound=Physical, according to your own definition, she is a robot.


image

Vocaloid is as much of an AI as Microsoft Excel or Adobe Premier are - _-

12 notes6 years ago

Anonymous: Are you saying wanting to screw a hard light hologram counts as robosexual though no robot is present?


Think of… a book. You have this block of paper, maybe with some cool images on the cover, but it is not the story. Then you may say that the words are the story, but they’re not, they’re smudges of ink neatly spread across the paper. The story is an informational phenomenon that can only happen when you read the book, and only if you can understand what the smudges are saying.

Then, an AI isn’t the computer nor body housing it, and it also isn’t the complex connections alternating between ons and offs to be interpreted as 1′s and 0′s. The AI is those series of 1′s and 0′s being used to perform logical operations, too advanced for me to describe, that allow it to be. The robosexual thought emerges from having profoundly associated the AI with the physical representation of what the informational being is.

In short:

image
4 notes6 years ago

pennycrossed: Miku is pretty much an AI and she get's robo sexual thoughts.


NO, SHUT YOU!! SHE AS A CHARACTER IS AN ENTITY EXISTING ENTIRELY ON INFORMATIONAL MEDIUMS, GOD ò Aó

image
4 notes6 years ago
drewsgroove:
“ gearholder:
“ drewsgroove:
“ gearholder:
“ NO YOU WALKING CESSPOOL OF ELECTROSIN, THE OBJECT MATTER HERE IS ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, AND THE POINT IS YOU CAN’T FUCK AN AI WITHOUT A BODY, WHICH IS WHY ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS DON’T EXTEND TO...

drewsgroove:

gearholder:

drewsgroove:

gearholder:

NO YOU WALKING CESSPOOL OF ELECTROSIN, THE OBJECT MATTER HERE IS ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, AND THE POINT IS YOU CAN’T FUCK AN AI WITHOUT A BODY, WHICH IS WHY ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS DON’T EXTEND TO AI’S

A ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHT WOULD BE SOMETHIN LIKE “Man I’d totally let aliens conquer the Earth just to put my weenus in Pivot’s weenus port” NOTICE THE INVOLVEMENT OF A PIECE OF HARDWARE THERE

SO LONG AS AI’S REMAIN TRAPPED IN A NON-PHYSICAL SPACE THEY CAN’T BE THE OBJECT OF ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, GODDDDDDD ò Aó

Then what’s this @gearholder

image

Originally posted by meowrightinthekisser

image

Originally posted by spartanlocke

Are you aware that light constitutes a physical phenomenon?

Like, even if intangible, a hologram is a physical body? Which is the thing an AI needs to entice robosexual thoughts? Yes? Do you see what’s happening here?

Is it that Cortana is an example of an AI that brings up robosexual thoughts? Or is it that halo 5 sucks*? Or am I missing the point?


*least I think it does. :\

Her hologram (light=physical) makes you think sexually about her. Remove that and then her voice (sound=also physical) may do it too.

An AI that is not physical exists only as the information that goes through a computing device.

(via drewsgroove)

25 notes6 years ago
drewsgroove:
“ gearholder:
“ NO YOU WALKING CESSPOOL OF ELECTROSIN, THE OBJECT MATTER HERE IS ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, AND THE POINT IS YOU CAN’T FUCK AN AI WITHOUT A BODY, WHICH IS WHY ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS DON’T EXTEND TO AI’S
A ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHT WOULD...

drewsgroove:

gearholder:

NO YOU WALKING CESSPOOL OF ELECTROSIN, THE OBJECT MATTER HERE IS ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, AND THE POINT IS YOU CAN’T FUCK AN AI WITHOUT A BODY, WHICH IS WHY ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS DON’T EXTEND TO AI’S

A ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHT WOULD BE SOMETHIN LIKE “Man I’d totally let aliens conquer the Earth just to put my weenus in Pivot’s weenus port” NOTICE THE INVOLVEMENT OF A PIECE OF HARDWARE THERE

SO LONG AS AI’S REMAIN TRAPPED IN A NON-PHYSICAL SPACE THEY CAN’T BE THE OBJECT OF ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, GODDDDDDD ò Aó

Then what’s this @gearholder

image

Originally posted by meowrightinthekisser

image

Originally posted by spartanlocke

Are you aware that light constitutes a physical phenomenon?

Like, even if intangible, a hologram is a physical body? Which is the thing an AI needs to entice robosexual thoughts? Yes? Do you see what’s happening here?

(via drewsgroove)

25 notes6 years ago
Cyborgs are humans.
image

Cyborgs are humans.

10 notes6 years ago
NO YOU WALKING CESSPOOL OF ELECTROSIN, THE OBJECT MATTER HERE IS ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, AND THE POINT IS YOU CAN’T FUCK AN AI WITHOUT A BODY, WHICH IS WHY ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS DON’T EXTEND TO AI’S
A ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHT WOULD BE SOMETHIN LIKE “Man I’d...

NO YOU WALKING CESSPOOL OF ELECTROSIN, THE OBJECT MATTER HERE IS ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, AND THE POINT IS YOU CAN’T FUCK AN AI WITHOUT A BODY, WHICH IS WHY ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS DON’T EXTEND TO AI’S

A ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHT WOULD BE SOMETHIN LIKE “Man I’d totally let aliens conquer the Earth just to put my weenus in Pivot’s weenus port” NOTICE THE INVOLVEMENT OF A PIECE OF HARDWARE THERE

SO LONG AS AI’S REMAIN TRAPPED IN A NON-PHYSICAL SPACE THEY CAN’T BE THE OBJECT OF ROBOSEXUAL THOUGHTS, GODDDDDDD ò Aó

25 notes6 years ago

sir-rigel: So semi-serious question: if robosexual thoughts don't include humanoid AI... how in the hell would you fuck it without a humanoid robot?


gearholder:

gearholder:

They’re THOUGHTS you seafoam gimp lipped shell of a shadow, they dont have a body to begin with . _.

image

We’ve been over this Zedrino - .-

image
image

Rigel fuckin pay attention you . _.

19 notes6 years ago

sir-rigel: So semi-serious question: if robosexual thoughts don't include humanoid AI... how in the hell would you fuck it without a humanoid robot?


gearholder:

They’re THOUGHTS you seafoam gimp lipped shell of a shadow, they dont have a body to begin with . _.

image

We’ve been over this Zedrino - .-

19 notes6 years ago