sir-rigel: Ok, seriously though, how does a cyborg that has a full body prosthetic fit into this entire thing, like Motoko Kusanagi? does that still count as a human to human relationship, or is that robosexual?
The formal cause does not matter for a human, for they cannot be boxed into one single final cause, and most certainly not into a sexual final cause.
Get this ship of Theseus bullshit outta my askbox - _-

Listen, if an entity is able to cross from the realm of information to the physical realm then by all means fuck their brains out.
Tulpas, materialized Digimon, anything that escapes their narrative through SCP-826, none of these manufactured beings have any bearing or influence on human endeavor and pose no threat to the planet -` A´-
The danger of robosexuality is that it combines lust with sloth, and doing two sins at once is a recipe for disaster. Aliens-destroying-your-planet levels of disaster -` A´-

If image doesn’t work click HERE
Now I’m intrigued too…
And don’t forget that you can see new pages of my other comics earlier in Patreon.
And here’s my Commission info.

meat-monster-deactivated2018010: I'm gonna build an andriod that perfectly caters to your desires as a woman wait until you've fallen in love with her, married her, and are on your 2nd anniversary date then just burst in and tell you she's a fuckable robot
Fuckin tryhard - _-

Found this doodly whilst clearing my computer, thought it would be fine here…
(via kalianos)
insanelyfriendlybear: But... XJ9?
- She’s explicitly a robot in her universe.
- This makes her not for sexual.
- Making her be for sexual is heresy.
- Enjoying content depicting her sexually (i.e. having robosexual thoughts) is also heresy.


