PSA: journalists aren’t supposed to put names in the headlines if the person isn’t a public figure. It’s not a matter of maliciously not giving credit
^^^as a journalist, this is something that bothers me ALL THE TIME
A friend of mine on Twitter explained this the other day, so to elaborate based on what she said: If the name is not instantly recognizable the way a public figure is, then putting the name in the headline isn’t going to bring about any sort of recognition or connection in the reader, and doesn’t do much to draw the reader into the story. But something like “local teen” does create a connection by tying the person into the community, and encourages the reader to learn more about what this local teen has done. The name will be in the article itself, after the headline has done its job at getting the reader to look into it.
It’s a We Are Number One parody video that has infested unreleased/deleted episodes, in which its effect kills the Game Grumps via exponential increases in the number of Dans and Arins present in the reduced space of the recording room for every replay of the video or subsequent episode in a series ò Aó
micchy-did-nothing-wrong: "#I swear to god if this is AWCY ;` A´;" I don't think it is tbh. It lacks the surrealist, avant-garde feeling that brands AWCY works, even when AWCY have not actively branded it as their own. This? This is just horrifying, and on some level actively malicious.
It’s too violent for havin been made by the gamers, goddamit; it’s gotta be at least the last pathetic attempt at anart from an untalented AWCY hack before defecting to the GAW, this is my headcanon ò Aó
Okay, but the laserdisc player is obviously a joke, whereas 3006 takes things to an extreme that just doesn’t fit for AWCY or GAW. Neither group has, in what I’ve seen, intentionally ventured into something that incredibly disturbing, and infectious to boot.
They’ve made potatoes that burn people alive, by the hundreds to thousands; a statue that compels adults into performing horrible acts toward young girls; videos that corrupt the human mind, which they then distribute among large groups of people to prove a bullshit point; a painting that painfully reverts the viewers to a primal stage. These fuckers are already disturbed.
There are works that have failed right from conception or weren’t completed, so their message is unclear or non-existent.
Anonymous: Sup with the big reaction over 3006?